North Aegean Stories
Administrative Continuities
Reflections on the diachronic impact of government on the life of the island by Dimitris Krallis
With the arrival of the Greek fleet in Mytilene in 1912, Admiral Kountouriotis issued a communiqué to the local population in which as representative of the Kingdom of Greek he clearly referred to the imperative to maintain the island’s property regime and to secure the rights to individual, private property. The Greek government’s interest in private property expresses here a liberal sensibility which was by now deeply rooted in the legal and economic consciousness of the inhabitants of Greece. But the reality in Lesvos had for years been much more complex. In fact, for centuries, both during the Byzantine period and under Ottoman rule, the relationship of the population to the land had been quite different from what we find in the 19th c. and in the time of the island’s integration to Greece.
With the guidance of Konstantinos Kabouridis, whose book on the subject guides us through the Ottoman tax registers, we travel to the sixteenth century, in a rather different administrative and socio-economic geography [1]. In northern Lesvos then, we find both important continuities and dramatic discontinuities. Molyvos itself was part of the Sultan’s domains (hâss in Turkish, in Greek hasi). The villages of Vafya, Komano, and Halika were also Sultanic possessions. In the cadasters we recognize settlements which are very much still present on the map today. The settlements of Hlyo and Oskudaro, were granted as tithe to sipahis (cavalrymen of the Ottoman army). Kehranda, a wealthy village with a considerable income, 175 Christian and 3 Muslim households, was a source of commonly shared tribute for 17 of the defenders of Mytilene’s castle. The census of 1581 refers to “Kehranda, other name Filya”, which has since 1548 increased both its population (by about twenty households), as well as its revenues. Kehranda is now a timar of the soldiers serving in the castle of Molyvos. The village of Ligona was a timar [2] for the commander of the fortress of Molyvos and his deputy, while Lasyona paid for the salaries and lifestyle of the religious officials of the castle of Molyvos. Petra, with its remarkable agricultural bounty, and Petri and Chilio Pigadi supported the 36 defenders of the castle of Molyvos
Watching a bright red sun sink behind the peak of Mt. Athos, from the heights above Petra, one wonders how tenants on lands owned by the Athonite monasteries in Lesvos, experienced the monks' distant rule. How did the local population experience distant administrative regimes? The Ottoman registers of the sixteenth century raise rather similar questions.
What do we observe here with the help of our colleague? Multiple relationships of administrative and economic dependence between the Ottoman authorities – from the highest and most distant, that of the Sultan in Constantinople, to the most local – are immediately apparent, as expressed through the obligations of the villagers to the governors, religious leaders, and the groups of soldiers that constituted the official Ottoman presence on the island. We also find that the Ottoman state had no problem establishing dependencies and creating relationships between villagers and distant, sometimes absentee landowners, as we see in the case of the administrative subordination of Kehranda to the soldiers of the Mytilene castle. It would be interesting to consider how the local population perceived these obligations and how the proximity or distance that characterized these administrative and economic interdependencies affected the identities of the inhabitants of northern Lesvos.
The other day, as I watched the sunset from the heights above Petra, I observed a bright red sun sinking behind the imposing peak of Mt. Athos. I thought at that moment of Fotini Kondyli’s book on late Byzantine Lemnos and pondered the effect of this view on the paroikoi [3] of the lands that were then owned by the otherwise remote monasteries of Mount Athos [4]. How far away, yet so close, could an authority or an administrative regime seem to local populations? The Ottoman registers of the sixteenth century raise rather similar questions.
[1] Κωνσταντίνος Ε. Καμπουρίδης, Η Λέσβος τον 16ο αιώνα. Οικονομία και πληθυσμός. Το οθωμανικό κατάστιχο απογραφής του 1548 (Θεσσαλονίκη, Εκδόσεις Κ. & Μ. Σταμούλη, 2016), σ. 47.
[2] A timar was a land grant by the sultans of the Ottoman Empire to soldiers or other officials of the state. The land revenues acted as compensation for service.
[3] The paroikoi were non-proprietary hereditary holders of lands belonging to others, often distant landowners. They were part of the rural landscape in the Late-Middle and Late Byzantine era.
[4] Fotini Kondyli, Rural Communities in Late Byzantium: Resilience and Vulnerability in the Northern Aegean (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).
AEGEAN STORIES VAULT
North Aegean Stories
- Achliptarouda
- Administrative Continuities
- Allilodiplografia
- Barbarossa
- Daphnis and Chloe
- Dowry Contract & Residence Permit
- Education in the Ottoman Archives
- Egyptian Photo Parlours
- Egyptian stories
- Eleftheriadis: Paris/London
- E. Schmidt on Painted Houses
- Figures from Byzantine Lesvos
- Global Fashions
- Lomemili and Genoese trade
- Conze and Humann in Molyvos
- Nature in Lesvos
- C. T. Newton in Mytilene
- Ottoman Yearbooks
- Postcards
- Smyrna Photo Parlours
- S. Adam on Education in Lesvos
- Seismic Shifts
- Thinking about the state
- War Trauma
- Seals, Authentication and Identity
- A Medical Diploma and a world of connections
- The Vampire of Mytilene
- Women and Memory in Molyvos
Historial Background
Art Creation in Place
- Dimitris Krallis
- Mariza Krallis
- Aytek Soner Alpan
- Maria Mandamadiotou
- Aneurin Ellis-Evans
- Christina Sgouromiti
- Soloup (Antonis Nikolopoulos)
- Yannis Tentzeris
- Ethan Schmidt
- Nina Houle
- Sam Adam
- Emrecan Çelik
- Gregory Tsolakis
This project was supported by an SFU FASS Kickstarter Grant, by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation Centre for Hellenic Studies at SFU and by Gefyra, an SNF-funded collaboration between SFU and UCLA.
SUPPORTED BY
